How Apple can give us an affordable widescreen iPod, today.

In great anticipation of the upcoming Steve Jobs’ keynote speech at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday, June 11th, me and some fellow Apple fans were speculating about all the wonderful gadgets and technologies that will surely be announced this time. The iPhone, of course, is the main topic of the year (so far).

With that, the conversation shifted to a recent post on appleinsider.com discussing a patent filing made by Apple on a hand-held device (iPod, duh!) that displays its output on a front display screen but receives input through a touch-and-force-sensitive backside interface.

The idea is to free the front of the device from any buttons, clickwheel, etc. and fill all of that space with a nice, bright screen. You don’t really look at the buttons when you use them, so why not just put them on the back? This by the way, is what I think is one of the major design shortcomings of the Microsoft Zune (in my opinion). I like what they did the case, the screen is nice, the interface is good (I guess)… but the buttons on the front are ugly and they make less sens once you turn the darn thing sideways.

Anyway, back to the patent…

Such a device, while super-cool, would probably be expensive and not happening any time this year. Some other cloudy details in the filing mention some elaborate interface tricks that would again delay such a device until that kind of software gets developed.

Then it hits me! What if they use hardware that exists today to pull-off the same tricks?

And so, here is my vision ladies and gentlemen… the widePod

widePod (front)

Yes. This is what we all need right now. A big, non-touch sensitive (a.k.a. cheap) wide screen in the same size and form we all know and love. Apple already has this case… all they need is a new front (easy). And throw-in some coverflow goodness. Why not?

But the magic happens on the back.

widePod (back)

Yes! Stick a regular clickwheel back there and we are done! The thing is already touch sensitive, and all Apple would need to do is rearrange the guts of the thing and cut a nice round hole in the back.

I would buy it today!!

Would you?

The iPhone is great, but it does have its limitations. I, for example, could not fit all my music in 4 or even 8 gigs of storage that doesn’t even take into account the browser, OS and other stuff that’s already going to be in there. I don’t have $500, $600, much less $700 for a new device. I already have a 3G iPod, two iPod Videos, and a Shuffle (yes, I have a problem). But mostly, I’m stuck with my current cellphone deal where the penalty to drop them and switch to AT&T would add a good $200 bucks to the mix.

So, what do you say Apple engineers? Can you make something like this happen while we wait for a pimped-out ubber-iPod with mind-control, HD video, corkscrew, Wi-Fi and bluetooth?

Let’s hope something like this is this year’s “One more thing….”

Apple, iPhone, Shuffle and iPod are trademarks of Apple Inc. Zune is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Please don’t sue the crap out of me.


2 Responses to “How Apple can give us an affordable widescreen iPod, today.”

  1. Adam Says:

    The picture is for lefties only :P I personally wouldn’t buy this. I don’t think it’d be easy to use. You’d have to switch the device over if you wanted to use it (and hadn’t memorized the controls). While I do think a iPod with a widescreen is coming soon I don’t think it’ll look like that. Good render though.

  2. Miguel Says:

    :) Hehehe… Actually, since the click-wheel is meant to be used when you flip the iPod over it will actually be on the side of your right hand. And yes, you do have to “memorize” what the buttons are, but then again, I don’t even look at my click-wheel when I use my iPod.

    The idea is to move the controls out of the way of the front part so you can use all that space for the screen. The clue is that the PLAY/PAUSE button is backwards… hhuuu? hhuu? It’s supposed to be used upside-down without looking. (Tough crowd)

    Thanks for the comment!!!

    And finally, someone appreciates the photoshop time my cocker spaniel puts into the renditions.